But I confess to being puzzled.
We can put that issue aside, though.
The Economist magazine, like the New York Times, is often considered de rigueur reading by the elites of the world.Economist : making fun of religious people who also happen to be Texans.For majora's mask ben rom hack 6 hours Bill Emmott was sharing his experience as an editor-in-chief for The Economist and answered numerous questions from Ukrainian journalists.How, exactly, does he think we autocad 2010 keygen for windows 7 64 bit made "fun of religious people who also happen to be Texans".Why, the, economist would choose to highlight the deaths and embarrassing incidents involving various Christian religious figures in Texas befuddles.That was the point of the very short piece based on the sad death of the Texan Baptist pastor: it cast just a little light on the sort of technology and indeed of controversies that can be found in this sort of church.
Bill Emmott explained the Magazines commercial success by the fact that they prefer to sell analytical articles intended for a highly educated intelligent reader, rather than sell such a cheap product as news stories.
Now, that one is indeed intended to amuse.
Emmott's first email Dear Editor I am flattered that Edward Lasky should pay attention to small articles in The Economist.
In his opening address Serhiy Lizunov, the President of TNK-BP Ukraine, pointed out that the systematic and transparent interaction with mass media promotes increase in company capitalization and is not less important than production.
Has it covered other acts by nonreligious figures that have concerned parents?The title of the article, by the way, 'Texas's Dangerous Churches' probably an apt view of how they and their readers see George Bush's America.Yours sincerely, bill Emmott, editor, the Economist, ed Lasky's response.Emmott and his magazine, and because the exchange is rather interesting, we present the original item followed by the correspondence.Anyone who reads much of the Euromedia and is a subscriber.Emmott's second email Now I see Mr Lasky's problem: he has a prejudicial thesis that he wishes to support: we don't, apparently care for Christians, are iffy about Jews, disdainful about Israel and we willfully play down antiSemitism".As Mr Lasky might put it, we've scored a twofer: we've ridiculed both vegetables and people from Delaware.Economist magazine of incidents involving Texas churches.Because every week we seek to find a balance of stories some of which are, yes, of great importance but also many stories that may simply be of interest to our readers.In response, the Editor in Chief.